First, romance and ballet both emerged from and were patronized by extremely elite audiences and both emerged from and were developed in French or, at the very least, Franco-phone/phile cultures. Perhaps as a result, both bear very strong and overt imperialist impulses by virtue of the fact that they fetishize and romanticize--and Said would say "orientalize" the cultural Other. They also portray very determined and conventional gender roles, specific to courtly contexts. In other words, the privileged and dashin man woos a beautiful, important, and to varying extents, unreachable woman. Perhaps related to the last two points I just mentioned, both provide what could be characterized as escapist fantasy for their elite audiences. As one ballet critic noted, "Even the serfs have jewels in their hair."
My next task is to consider how each artform could possibly inform an interpretation or analysis of the other and then conclude what is revealed about society at large with regard to the specific contexts of each, or even, what they reveal about Western values, gender and class dynamics, and the relationship between art and audience.
Thoughts?
My favorite ballerina, Darci Kistler, performing a révérance.

No comments:
Post a Comment